
In reality, anything in life can be a interpretation of someone else's view of an event. The history books we learn from, they're based on historical document, but the men and women that were alive during this time that wrote this down, could have viewed it as their own interpretation therefore making it their own interpretation of the truth. As O' Brien quotes on the last page of How to Tell a True War Story "It wasn't a war story. It was a love story". (85) This is what O'Brien did, although the characters were not true or the exact details weren't the heartfelt emotions were what was true. Just as O' Brien quoted Pablo Picasso's famous quote "Art is all that makes us realize the truth" perfectly fits O' Brien's story and all the stories of life in general, all the fancy details and added facts helps us understand and dig down to what's real.
I believe that a fabrication of the truth is needed to make a story seemed appealing, many of the movies and books out have a common title "based on a true story" the underlying meaning is true, but a lot of the shocking events and characters are added in to make the story overall more entertaining and emotionally connecting. As long as the details are made up and the underlying meaning is true, that's all that matters right?
No comments:
Post a Comment